To view prices and purchase online, please login or create an account now.



The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution: Judicial Competence and Independence in the United Kingdom

Hardback

Main Details

Title The Separation of Powers in the Contemporary Constitution: Judicial Competence and Independence in the United Kingdom
Authors and Contributors      By (author) Roger Masterman
Physical Properties
Format:Hardback
Pages:298
Dimensions(mm): Height 229,Width 152
ISBN/Barcode 9780521493376
ClassificationsDewey:342.41044
Audience
Professional & Vocational

Publishing Details

Publisher Cambridge University Press
Imprint Cambridge University Press
Publication Date 2 December 2010
Publication Country United Kingdom

Description

In this 2010 book, Roger Masterman examines the dividing lines between the powers of the judicial branch of government and those of the executive and legislative branches in the light of two of the most significant constitutional reforms of recent years: the Human Rights Act (1998) and Constitutional Reform Act (2005). Both statutes have implications for the separation of powers within the United Kingdom constitution. The Human Rights Act brings the judges into much closer proximity with the decisions of political actors than previously permitted by the Wednesbury standard of review and the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, while the Constitutional Reform Act marks the emergence of an institutionally independent judicial branch. Taken together, the two legislative schemes form the backbone of a more comprehensive system of constitutional checks and balances policed by a judicial branch underpinned by the legitimacy of institutional independence.

Author Biography

Roger Masterman is Senior Lecturer in Law at Durham Law School, where his teaching and research interests lie in the area of constitutional law and reform.

Reviews

'Roger Masterman, of the law faculty at Durham, has produced an erudite treatise in the finest tradition of English legal scholarship, and one that, despite its thorough and detailed grounding in the intricacies of legal materials, should be perused by political scientists. (The notes alone, in fact, are a treasure trove).' Jerold Waltman, British Politics Group Quarterly